| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180420 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 12 '19 at 19:55 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.2%
Good
|
72% 129 Pts
|
55% 455 Pts
|
38% 608 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PowerColor(148C 2385) 2GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.1
|
22.9%
Poor
|
23% 30.3 fps
|
24% 28.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 459 284 288 287 281 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
91% 405 MB/s
|
165% 58 MB/s
|
270% 363 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown KD44GU480-26N160T 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
80.7%
Excellent
|
84% 29.6 GB/s
|
67% 23.5 GB/s
|
38% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 831 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 162x |
| Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 85x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 50x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 42x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $236 |