Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D PREMIUM  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101116
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 15:00
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 175
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 528
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.6% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 113
Parallax 99.8
87% 107 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 99
Splatting 81.6
74% 90.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 99 101 100 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 229
Write 223
Mixed 210
SusWrite 98.2
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 32.1
104% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 47
39% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
447GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 20 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.62% Terrible
Read 33.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 18.5
6% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.6
14% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 121%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
9GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 60 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 57
Mixed 56
SusWrite 60.2
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 76%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
50GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 100 101 100 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 113
Write 101
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 99.3
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 98%
WD My Passport 25E4 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 28
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 18.8
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 54%
OWC Express USB 3.0 120GB
106GB free, PID a0a9
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 84 82 84 84 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
Read 95.2
Write 81.7
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 81.5
114% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 8.4
1,068% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 13.2
DQ Write 30.6
DQ Mixed 13.1
1,535% 19 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D PREMIUM Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $312
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback