Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181106
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '19 at 14:06
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815 4,560 User benchmarks, average bench 83% CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 77.3 1-Core 141 2-Core 280 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 1,116 97% 830 Pts	64-Core 2,624 162% 2,624 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.1% Excellent	Lighting 99.9 Reflection 86.9 Parallax 89.4 81% 92.1 fps	MRender 93.7 Gravity 93.7 Splatting 95.9 78% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 995 862 829 812 801 784 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 2,239 Write 1,410 Mixed 870 SusWrite 847 297% 1,341 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 67.8 244% 90.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,257 DQ Write 772 DQ Mixed 907 705% 979 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 353%
Plextor M5 Pro 256GB-$100 2,451 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 88GB free Firmware: 1.05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 409 417 384 412 419 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 427 Mixed 306 SusWrite 409 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 40.6 145% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 215 196% 301 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 106%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 29GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 125 124 113 112 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 436 Write 235 Mixed 124 SusWrite 119 50% 228 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 90.8 4K Mixed 33.6 136% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 125 111% 173 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 105%
Tammuz M720 PRO 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 210% 377GB free Firmware: ECFM11.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 992 987 984 982 986 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 1,577 Write 2,352 Mixed 1651 SusWrite 1,059 375% 1,660 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 175 4K Mixed 73.5 261% 99.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,418 DQ Write 752 DQ Mixed 1,044 787% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 268%
Toshiba MD04ACA400N 4TB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 249GB free Firmware: FJ1V SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 112 113 111 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 100 Mixed 60 SusWrite 112 67% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 67GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 96.2 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 95 56% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 4x8GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 49 MC Mixed 29.5 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 9.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 133%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

CPU
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	45x
Core i9-9900XIntel $590Bench 84%, 3,521 samples	28x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	24x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	23x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	18x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	17x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $80Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	59x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	50x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $1,628

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16