Asus B75M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus B75M-A  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 13:53
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-2400-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46% Average
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 147
52% 111 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 284
39% 288 Pts
64-Core 309
21% 309 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$150
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB; GB EX-GTX1050TI-OG4
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Lighting 118
Reflection 81.9
Parallax 120
37% 106 fps
MRender 81
Gravity 115
Splatting 84.8
40% 93.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$43
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 170 94 93 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 456
Write 315
Mixed 260
SusWrite 139
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 31.6
115% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 216
197% 303 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$59
281GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 86
Write 87.5
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 83.7
60% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
8GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 14.2
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 16.9
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
130% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49%
Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 1,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $296
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX Vega 56 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback