Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 11:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-4460-$185
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.5% Good
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
72% 153 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 393
54% 396 Pts
64-Core 386
26% 386 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 109 61 63 77 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 455
Write 310
Mixed 111
SusWrite 76.8
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 36
125% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 185
160% 234 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 95%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$99
713GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 96 91 96 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.5
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 93.1
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1923 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 48%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 7,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $967
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 580 $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback