Asus P5KPL-CM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-CM  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 11:30
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$20
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
26% Poor
SC Int 71.9
SC Float 38
SC Mixed 54.3
44% 54.7 Pts
QC Int 144
QC Float 84.3
QC Mixed 106
25% 111 Pts
MC Int 145
MC Float 84.3
MC Mixed 108
17% 112 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6600
Device(107D 597B) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
0.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 0.1
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.26%
Great: 0%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT722525DLA380 250GB-$59
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V44OA9BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 20 10 6.5 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 61.5
Write 37
Mixed 38
SusWrite 15.1
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 37%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
23GB free
Firmware: V5DOA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 24 18 15 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 43.5
Write 41.3
Mixed 28
SusWrite 20.7
25% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 36%
Maxtor STM3160211AS 160GB
78GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 44 44 38 41 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 60.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 43.4
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 40%
Maxtor STM3160211AS 160GB
16GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 44 39 41 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 54.3
Write 11.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 43.6
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 23%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P5KPL-CM Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $65
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $84
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $140Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $213Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $274Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback