Asus P5KPL-CM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-CM  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 11:30
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$34
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.8% Poor
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 107
38% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 106
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6600
Device(107D 597B) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 0.1
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.04%
Great: 0%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT722525DLA380 250GB-$59
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V44OA9BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 20 10 6.5 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 61.5
Write 37
Mixed 38
SusWrite 15.1
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 37%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
23GB free
Firmware: V5DOA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 24 18 15 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 43.5
Write 41.3
Mixed 28
SusWrite 20.7
25% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 36%
Maxtor STM3160211AS 160GB
78GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 44 44 38 41 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 60.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 43.4
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 40%
Maxtor STM3160211AS 160GB
16GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 44 39 41 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 54.3
Write 11.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 43.6
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 24%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5KPL-CM Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $120
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback