Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 06:40
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 719
72% 587 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.3% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 138
Parallax 115
100% 125 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 121
Splatting 103
87% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
17GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 493
Write 478
Mixed 386
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 56.9
197% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 358
273% 368 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,308
Write 1,142
Mixed 990
255% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 72.7
244% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 978
737% 982 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
817GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 157 154 156 157 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 152
Mixed 104
SusWrite 158
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
591GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 137 137 137 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 151
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 136
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 33.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 28.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback