HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8309
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 05:50
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$103
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 185
67% 142 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 237
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 235
16% 235 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
HP(103C 83C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.6% Average
Lighting 157
Reflection 169
Parallax 254
41% 193 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 157
Splatting 125
45% 141 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,438
Write 2,126
Mixed 1,513
450% 2,026 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 83.7
282% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 832
625% 834 MB/s
Poor: 167% Great: 290%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
599GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 153 153 153 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 145
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 152
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 113%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$65
714GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 143
Write 111
Mixed 107
SusWrite 122
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 77%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 85.9
Write 92.1
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 97.8
120% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 23.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 3,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $509
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback