PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180312 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 11 '19 at 23:12 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 95 39 74 32 94 MB/s
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174
16GB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 81 63 56 58 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 1,521x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 949x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 556x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 310x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 268x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 237x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $581 |