MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A35
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35) (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170923
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 17:25
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	46.8% Average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 63.1 2-Core 114 46% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 293 31% 247 Pts	64-Core 536 33% 536 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85E9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63.6% Good	Lighting 84.7 Reflection 114 Parallax 110 69% 103 fps	MRender 60.2 Gravity 40.8 Splatting 85.4 53% 62.1 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 316GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 326 354 318 407 364 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 36.8 Write 283 Mixed 156 SusWrite 356 48% 208 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 3.2 10% 4.2 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 126 84% 102 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 232GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 285 274 286 280 214 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 371 Write 340 Mixed 340 SusWrite 276 75% 332 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 25.9 106% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 293 225% 306 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 466GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 340 360 371 392 265 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 389 Write 342 Mixed 356 SusWrite 340 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 24.6 81% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 272 214% 296 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 154 160 154 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 133 Write 157 Mixed 73.9 SusWrite 150 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	86.8% Excellent	MC Read 36.2 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 34.4 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 12.5 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35) Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	12x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	9x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $752

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)