Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2PH
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 11:11
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 126 2-Core 245 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 660 66% 534 Pts	64-Core 654 40% 654 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 38.8 33% 37.1 fps	MRender 39.3 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 37.2 32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 480GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 219 253 289 247 291 MB/s Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	70.7% Very good	Read 193 Write 93.6 Mixed 224 SusWrite 253 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 38.8 116% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 34.3 83% 173 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 392GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 98 100 100 101 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 116 Write 102 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 96.6 73% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB 30,824 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 11.1 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2PH-CF Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF

CPU
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	116x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	108x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	99x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	100x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	18x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	16x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16