Advantec CX Nice Evo II

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Advantec CX Nice Evo II (all builds)
Motherboard	ADVANTEC C15B
Memory	8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 04:19
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 17.2 2-Core 101 39% 63.5 Pts	4-Core 53.8 8-Core 113 10% 83.4 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 2109) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 8.62 Parallax 1.16 2% 3.88 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.22 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 43 134 85 52 171 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 197 Write 37.5 Mixed 45 SusWrite 120 22% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 10.7 42% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 20 DQ Mixed 17.3 14% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 397GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 93 94 94 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 60.5 Write 57.8 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 93.1 46% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MAGNUMTECH 0721 MXSD308133309TA7R 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.4% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 14 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 11.2 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 97.1 41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CX Nice Evo II Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Advantec CX Nice Evo II

CPU
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	3x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	4x

RAM
99U5469-045.A00LF 1311 NT2GC64B88G0NS-DI 6GBKingstonBench 38%, 2 samples	2x
GKH400SO51208-1600 0721 MXSD3L04160011XB8R 8GBUnknownBench 51%, 1 sample	1x
MXSD308133309TA7R 1x8GBUnknownBench 26%, 18 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $39

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Advantec CX Nice Evo II

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Advantec CX Nice Evo II

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)