Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 152
2-Core 284
99% 178 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 913
86% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,197
74% 1,197 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 38
32% 36.5 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 36.2
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 132
Parallax 116
102% 124 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 113
Splatting 101
87% 107 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
265GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 367 367 367 367 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 469
Mixed 420
SusWrite 371
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.9
205% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,332
Write 1,302
Mixed 1,236
357% 1,623 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 78.9
272% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 1,136
DQ Mixed 1,010
774% 1,041 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54
162GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 158 158 155 149 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 488
Write 158
Mixed 234
SusWrite 153
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 15.3
75% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 20.4
59% 139 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
48GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 147 139 69 67 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 474
Write 154
Mixed 218
SusWrite 119
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.2
64% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
254GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 46 47 47 48 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 56.5
Write 44.3
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 43.5
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
4TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.6 14 33 38 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
517GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 43 43 42 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 54.5
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 42.5
34% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
118GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 45 46 47 48 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 7.5
Write 11.2
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 42.7
13% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
44GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 112 112 113 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 158
Write 108
Mixed 73
SusWrite 111
144% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
164% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.3
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 28.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,030
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback