Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 17:55
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
51.3% Above average
SC Int 87.9
SC Float 79.8
SC Mixed 88.1
59% 85.3 Pts
QC Int 258
QC Float 254
QC Mixed 260
46% 257 Pts
MC Int 254
MC Float 264
MC Mixed 280
18% 266 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B E177) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 62.7
20% 57 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 45.9
17% 40.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$33
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 64 57 64 217 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 385
Write 35.3
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 124
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 8.1
44% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 10.5
10% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$70
506GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 27 26 26 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 26.3
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 25.5
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 3.1 2.9 2.6 3.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Read 12
Write 14.3
Mixed 10
SusWrite 2.7
7% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 115%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$66
369GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 101 120 118 117 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 67.5
Write 69.8
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 116
52% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.3
93% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BL51264BA160A.16FH 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 2,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $800
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback