Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 16:36
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 99
47% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 229
26% 205 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.9% Very good
Lighting 87.9
Reflection 96.7
Parallax 94.3
72% 93 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 91.4
Splatting 92.1
75% 91.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 285 330 337 349 325 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 345
Write 340
Mixed 296
SusWrite 320
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 29.2
92% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 77
DQ Mixed 45.4
38% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109
740GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 123 121 123 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 124
Mixed 66
SusWrite 123
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
1TB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 88 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 104
Write 97.3
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 87.6
110% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback