LORD GM965 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	LORD GM965 Series (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141022
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '19 at 13:19
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 58 1-Core 14.7 2-Core 40.3 27% 37.7 Pts	4-Core 74.6 8-Core 74.3 10% 74.4 Pts	64-Core 56.1 4% 56.1 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.7% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 3.87 4% 4.13 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.7% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Q-180 180GB 748 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 77GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 12 12 15 23 25 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	2.73% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 25.5 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 17.6 4% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 4% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 2.73% Great: 90%
Maxtor 6L200M0 204GB-$44 1,500 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: BACE1G20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 18 20 19 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 18.5 Write 9.5 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 19 11% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8.15% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1.1 4% 1.37 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.15% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GM965 Series Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: LORD GM965 Series

CPU
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	1x
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	1x

GPU
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	3x

RAM
1x1GBUnknownBench 17%, 12,162 samples	2x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

LORD GM965 Series

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: LORD GM965 Series

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)