HP 260-a152ng

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 260-a152ng  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B3
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 06:10
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 55
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 71.5
36% 55 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 122
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
HP(103C 81B3) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 11.3
2% 10 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 7.4
2% 6.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$105
481GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 374 370 391 410 395 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 430
Write 399
Mixed 290
SusWrite 379
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 23.2
80% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 179
139% 190 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback