MSI MS-16G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE620/GE620DX/FX620DX/FX623
MotherboardMSI MS-16G5  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110926
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 19:40
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$106
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 88.2
1-Core 60
2-Core 102
56% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 130
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 133
9% 133 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
MSI(1462 108D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4411
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.53
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 1.53
5% 4.57 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 5.04
2% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$100
678GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 457 474 475 492 497 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 84% Great: 135%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Nanya M2S4G64CB8HD5N-CG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MS-16G5 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $267
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback