Asus P8H61-M

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '19 at 10:22
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 95.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 216 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 418 55% 415 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 869F) CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 99.8 Parallax 94.7 84% 99 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 91.7 Splatting 85.9 77% 94.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX300-120 120GB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 64 109 65 74 61 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.5% Above average	Read 254 Write 196 Mixed 143 SusWrite 88.7 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 29.6 84% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 156 129% 185 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 45GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 139 137 134 155 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 141 Write 144 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 141 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 50GB free Firmware: JP2OA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 85 82 74 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 85 Write 81.8 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 84.2 54% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.3 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 56.7 70% 56.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M - $77

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	34x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	32x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	25x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	8x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	5x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	4x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $355

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16