PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2 (all builds) |
Memory | 0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1366x768x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140624 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 08 '19 at 14:28 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
590GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 74 108 100 67 95 MB/s
|
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 26x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 22x |
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 17x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 8x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Average | Total price: $285 |