Asus N53Jq

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N53Jq  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N53Jq
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101014
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 13:27
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 50.8
2-Core 45.6
41% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 116
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Asus(1043 1522) 1GB
CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 359.46
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 3
3% 3.45 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 2.48
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-065.A00LF 8325 FSFF65F-C8KM9 8325 FSFF65F-C8KM9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.7% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N53Jq Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N53Jq

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $230
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback