Asrock B85M-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B85M-ITX (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140901
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '19 at 04:18
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 96.2 2-Core 191 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 319 39% 300 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 355.82 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Lighting 23.6 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 19.9 19% 20.3 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 20.7 Splatting 17 17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 282 278 283 286 284 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 451 Mixed 357 SusWrite 279 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 53.8 187% 67.2 MB/s	DQ Read 325 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 311 232% 308 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 214GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 69 70 70 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 71.5 Write 70.7 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 68 46% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 47,852 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	61% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 18.9 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-ITX Builds (Compare 220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M-ITX - $102

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	22x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	20x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	18x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	21x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	12x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	8x
MX500 2TBCrucial $146Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	6x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	9x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	8x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16