Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 04:03
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.7% Above average
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 173
63% 133 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 548
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 773
52% 773 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$415
Gigabyte(1458 3FBD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Lighting 144
Reflection 163
Parallax 192
38% 166 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 208
Splatting 115
54% 143 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$110
491GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 423 437 440 422 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 445
Mixed 419
SusWrite 427
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 41.7
137% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 266
198% 263 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99%
Great: 135%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
299GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 136
Write 135
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 113
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 77%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 23,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $688
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback