Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 47.9 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 50 27% 40.8 Pts	4-Core 44.7 8-Core 48.1 6% 46.4 Pts	64-Core 46.4 3% 46.4 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 306.97 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.69% Terrible	Lighting 3.33 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 1.28 3% 3.06 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 3 3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.69% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36 2,469 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0303 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 49 50 55 58 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 63.2 Write 55.7 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 51 37% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	7.7% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.27 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 2.2 5% 1.7 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.7% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples	1x
Core2 4400Intel $108Bench 33%, 1,900 samples	1x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x
Radeon HD 3450ATIBench 1%, 4,621 samples	1x
Radeon HD 2400-PROATIBench 1%, 2,899 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16