Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 14:36
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5930K-$560
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.2% Good
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
70% 146 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 604
61% 482 Pts
64-Core 756
51% 756 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 196
Reflection 157
Parallax 269
54% 207 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 170
Splatting 179
49% 158 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$102
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 142 176 195 192 249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 420
Write 83
Mixed 135
SusWrite 178
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 28.7
114% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 174
147% 222 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 100 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 129
Write 122
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 99.9
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 112%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 019b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 35.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 37.6
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C13 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 35.3
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 4,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,407
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback