Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 13:53
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$198
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
63.1% Good
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 193
68% 144 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 525
55% 433 Pts
64-Core 529
36% 529 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$190
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.7% Good
Lighting 236
Reflection 197
Parallax 213
62% 216 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 221
Splatting 181
61% 188 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 57%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$110
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 242 231 134 113 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 364
Write 171
Mixed 339
SusWrite 198
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 30.8
123% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 184
137% 186 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$74
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 139 139 139 134 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 148
Write 151
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 139
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$42
285GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 139 138 135 129 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 140
Write 144
Mixed 83
SusWrite 136
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 109%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
876GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 92 87 88 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 88.7
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 103%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$90
679GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 130 126 128 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 128
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 109%
Disk drive 1TB
639GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 69 67 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
Read 67.8
Write 50.8
Mixed 18
SusWrite 69.5
67% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
48% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48%
Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 14,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $456
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback