Asus A58M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus A58M-E  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 12:22
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.2% Average
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 130
47% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 245
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 240
16% 240 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$135
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 132
Reflection 126
Parallax 166
35% 141 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 120
Splatting 79.7
34% 101 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 37%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 120GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 65 71 74 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.4% Average
Read 240
Write 63.6
Mixed 101
SusWrite 67.4
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 18.2
84% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 40.7
DQ Mixed 19.3
19% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
146GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 108 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 107
Write 98.3
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 108
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
119GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 144 148 146 144 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 153
Write 160
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 142
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 16.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 11.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A58M-E Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A58M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $155
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback