Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 06 '19 at 18:54
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 133
60% 97 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 429
40% 335 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 37.7
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 36
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67% Good
Read 399
Write 392
Mixed 389
SusWrite 231
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 38.7
107% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 42.1
36% 50 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 67%
Great: 129%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 103 101 104 103 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 84.7
Mixed 30
SusWrite 101
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53
783GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 123 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 120
Write 128
Mixed 56
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 69%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
232GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 88 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 88.4
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback