| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung RC530/RC730 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG RC530/RC730 |
| Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110810 |
| Uptime | 4.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 06 '19 at 17:20 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.9%
Above average
|
52% 74.5 Pts
|
24% 211 Pts
|
11% 181 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0C1) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
|
1.92%
Terrible
|
2% 2.45 fps
|
2% 2.97 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 38 8.1 21 6.8 3.8 MB/s
|
32%
Below average
|
45% 203 MB/s
|
32% 10.5 MB/s
|
46% 77.1 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
332GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 78 78 MB/s
|
46.5%
Average
|
54% 74.2 MB/s
|
126% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 1TB
78GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 23 25 26 25 MB/s
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
32% 24.3 MB/s
|
97% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
47%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
54% 74.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical RC530/RC730 Builds (Compare 204 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung RC530/RC730
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 101x |
| Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 50x |
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 138x |
| GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples | 56x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $246 |