Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 70.5 1-Core 92.2 2-Core 159 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 512 51% 415 Pts	64-Core 469 29% 469 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8310A 128GB 4,082 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80060C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 187 183 185 185 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 894 Write 408 Mixed 574 SusWrite 189 114% 516 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 31.4 134% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 239 154% 172 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 132%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 921GB free Firmware: JU003E SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 129 130 130 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 138 Write 130 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 131 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Ramaxel RMSA3270NA86H9F-2400 8GB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67.8% Good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 21.9 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 21 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 Mobile GraphicsAMDBench 8%, 8,935 samples	105x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	78x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples	60x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 8GBSamsungBench 56%, 2,711 samples	26x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	21x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	20x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16