PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 7.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 176C |
Memory | 28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190419 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 06 '19 at 13:59 |
Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
CPU Throttled | 99% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5000M
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.73
|
7.73%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 449 451 445 352 292 MB/s
|
95.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples | 99x |
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 92x |
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples | 82x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples | 296x |
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples | 95x |
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $100 |