Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '19 at 11:23
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 47.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 225 67% 129 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 604 59% 485 Pts	64-Core 599 37% 599 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 16,200 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 18F1) 3GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.16 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 31 Parallax 36.8 31% 35.5 fps	MRender 29.1 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 30.9 27% 32.6 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59 8,648 User benchmarks, average bench 193% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 437 436 438 437 438 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 612 Write 567 Mixed 577 SusWrite 442 124% 550 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 54.2 181% 67.6 MB/s	DQ Read 851 DQ Write 721 DQ Mixed 769 581% 780 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 228%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 126 125 133 133 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 132 Write 117 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 130 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 228% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.3% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	307x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	57x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	168x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	159x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	37x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	90x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	63x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	45x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	62x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	56x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16