Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	375% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	123.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180626
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '19 at 22:08
Run Duration	428 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 131 2-Core 262 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 1,048 92% 779 Pts	64-Core 1,721 106% 1,721 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 86% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 812GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2470 2263 2395 2284 2333 2334 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	375% Outstanding	Read 2,508 Write 2119 Mixed 1,389 SusWrite 2,347 469% 2,091 MB/s	4K Read 56.4 4K Write 188 4K Mixed 76.2 283% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,074 DQ Write 920 DQ Mixed 1,007 752% 1,000 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 375% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 233GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2136 2157 2135 2123 2118 2123 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	362% Outstanding	Read 2,353 Write 2,112 Mixed 1,356 SusWrite 2,132 446% 1,988 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 198 4K Mixed 88.1 293% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,122 DQ Write 962 DQ Mixed 1,066 792% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 362% Great: 393%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 208GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2126 2133 2128 2131 2138 2140 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	362% Outstanding	Read 2,296 Write 2110 Mixed 1,425 SusWrite 2,133 448% 1,991 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 197 4K Mixed 90.9 292% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,154 DQ Write 1,040 DQ Mixed 1,078 814% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 362% Great: 393%
Seagate ST8000DM002-1YW112 8TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 3TB free Firmware: DN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 203 202 202 203 200 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 94%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 205 208 211 211 211 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 192 193 193 192 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: A4GNW91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 133 137 141 145 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 179 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 140 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.7 232% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 110%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 155 157 153 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 144 Write 148 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 155 96% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 97%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB 408 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 4.5TB free Firmware: LEGNT3D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 182 180 186 179 185 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 189 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 183 118% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.3 295% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C15 8x16GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	154% Outstanding	MC Read 64.2 MC Write 64 MC Mixed 57.1 176% 61.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 24.3 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 154%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16