Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '19 at 19:19
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2675QM 1,033 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 139 61% 99.9 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 291 34% 265 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0B3) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.951.9.3000 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 3.33 Reflection 3.65 Parallax 1.5 3% 2.83 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.17 2% 3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45 3,466 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 823GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 86 92 84 87 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 75.9 Write 92.4 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 85.2 53% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.6 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 15 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

CPU
Core i7-2675QMIntelBench 58%, 1,033 samples	51x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	27x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	7x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	58x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
iSSD P4 8GBSandiskBench 13%, 294 samples	4x
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	16x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 1,624 samples	14x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 38%, 674 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16