| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.2 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121130 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 05 '19 at 17:59 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.3%
Good
|
54% 84.9 Pts
|
30% 239 Pts
|
17% 279 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1048 MHz, MLim: 1302 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
|
36.3%
Below average
|
38% 46.5 fps
|
32% 38.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 194 180 180 156 169 MB/s
|
59.8%
Above average
|
49% 217 MB/s
|
114% 38.2 MB/s
|
69% 88.7 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
258GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 50 51 51 51 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
45% 61.2 MB/s
|
97% 0.7 MB/s
| |
|
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
345GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 50 51 51 51 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
43% 58.3 MB/s
|
129% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 200 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.6%
Poor
|
21% 7.23 GB/s
|
20% 7 GB/s
|
53% 74.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 214 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 81x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 26x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 13x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $193 |