MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory122.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '19 at 17:22
Run Duration454 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$798
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 859
75% 642 Pts
64-Core 2,326
144% 2,326 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76% Very good
Lighting 95.9
Reflection 106
Parallax 89
78% 96.9 fps
MRender 82.8
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 91
72% 87.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 88 93 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 430
Write 466
Mixed 405
SusWrite 89.9
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 35
126% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 166
127% 169 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 375%
Amd-raid Array 5 1TB
834GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2567 2572 2565 2560 2556 2551 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,617
Write 2,552
Mixed 1,315
SusWrite 2562
457% 2,011 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 47.7
156% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 243
180% 236 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 280%
Great: 318%
Amd-raid Array 7 1TB
889GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2602 2612 2608 2608 2612 2526 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,480
Write 2,600
Mixed 1,193
SusWrite 2,595
447% 1,967 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 45.3
149% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 217
162% 215 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 274%
Great: 311%
Amd-raid Array 6 1TB
777GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2601 2604 2610 2604 2494 2477 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,141
Write 2,399
Mixed 1308
SusWrite 2565
475% 2,103 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 46.3
150% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 218
163% 216 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 299%
Great: 328%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
216GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 374 371 379 381 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 437
Write 436
Mixed 384
SusWrite 376
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 41.5
134% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 160
119% 156 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
222GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 372 370 378 380 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 436
Write 424
Mixed 381
SusWrite 375
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 41.7
134% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 159
119% 157 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 134%
Amd-raid Array 2 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 95 97 92 96 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 453
Write 508
Mixed 430
SusWrite 95.5
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 33.3
119% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 170
130% 172 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 422%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 80 76 79 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 109
SusWrite 78.7
74% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.1
233% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 190%
Amd-raid Array 3 16TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 91 94 94 95 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 261
Write 190
Mixed 166
SusWrite 93.8
132% 178 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 2
554% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 103%
Great: 230%
Lexar WorkflowCFR1 32GB
10GB free, PID ba02
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 128
Mixed 67
135% 111 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.8
178% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 58.8
MC Write 57.5
MC Mixed 53.2
161% 56.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 142%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback