Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '19 at 08:19
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7670K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 122
50% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 166
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1013.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 9
6% 8.36 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 8.48
6% 7.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37120G 120GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 387
Write 347
Mixed 319
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 37
128% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 29.7
78% 165 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 14.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback