Pegatron IPMSB-H61

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemPegatron IPMSB-H61  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20101104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '19 at 16:16
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium G640-$30
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 141
62% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 143
20% 143 Pts
64-Core 141
10% 141 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 55%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 50 57 51 61 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 46.8
Write 26.2
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 53.3
24% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$22
218GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 160 161 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 161
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 159
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F 2GB
1067, 1067 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical IPMSB-H61 Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 62%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron IPMSB-H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $98
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $325Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback