Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '19 at 11:04
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 277
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,055
96% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,528
94% 1,528 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB; Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti Founders edition
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
159% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 237
Parallax 251
176% 235 fps
MRender 269
Gravity 225
Splatting 151
169% 215 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 159%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 941 660 665 664 649 658 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,551
Write 2,343
Mixed 1516
SusWrite 706
397% 1,779 MB/s
4K Read 69.7
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 98.5
340% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,178
DQ Write 1,033
DQ Mixed 1,098
825% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 300%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
180GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 432 461 468 429 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 183
Mixed 291
SusWrite 462
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 60.4
209% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 257
209% 300 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 128%
Great: 126%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
366GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1618 1011 589 588 585 589 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,043
Write 1770
Mixed 897
SusWrite 830
309% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 66
280% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 1,078
DQ Mixed 932
734% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 264%
Great: 254%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 182
Write 88.4
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 75.4
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 109%
WD Gold 8TB (256MB Cache 2017)-$189
4.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 191 186 180 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 199
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 189
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.1
284% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFST.16FD 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 59.5
MC Mixed 33.4
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 12.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback