Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161019
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '19 at 04:31
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 228
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 572
59% 477 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 7.73
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 6.16
6% 10.3 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 54.9
Splatting 17.1
34% 45 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 367
Write 356
Mixed 348
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 28.9
98% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 126%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
24GB free
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 96 99 99 96 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 142
Write 115
Mixed 122
SusWrite 97.1
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 19.4
77% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 80
72% 110 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 61%
Kingston SVP100S296G 96GB
53GB free
Firmware: CJR10202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 182 198 194 193 193 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 189
Write 158
Mixed 122
SusWrite 188
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 14.6
51% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 17.2
23% 39 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 69%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 271 285 283 285 287 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 432
Mixed 386
SusWrite 290
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 45.9
160% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Kingston SVP100S296G 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 149 144 142 145 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 89
Write 110
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 145
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 23
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.9
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,155
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback