Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '19 at 23:12
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 445
50% 392 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
Lighting 78.6
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 66.5
64% 73.6 fps
MRender 77.1
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 76.7
62% 75.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 237 170 141 108 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 503
Write 464
Mixed 334
SusWrite 196
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 37.7
153% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 140
125% 194 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 147 151 149 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 164
Write 134
Mixed 84
SusWrite 147
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
285GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 138 141 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 144
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 139
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 109%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
877GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 92 91 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 90.4
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
680GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 129 130 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 122
Write 136
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 130
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 108%
Disk drive 1TB
639GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 72 70 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 64
Write 51.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 71.2
68% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $364
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback