Asus CG8565

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus CG8565  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8565
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 03 '19 at 19:40
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 96.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 225
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 593
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1323 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 42.5
Parallax 60.2
38% 49.7 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 39.8
40% 50.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 194 204 238 207 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 340
Write 214
Mixed 254
SusWrite 214
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 41.3
134% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 118
94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 118%
Maxtor 6L200M0 204GB-$44
165GB free
Firmware: BANC1G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 60.1
Write 51.1
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 51
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
125% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 35%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
430GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 94.3
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 93.4
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 216 208 219 219 220 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB
75GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 254 256 270 274 278 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 241
Write 234
Mixed 223
SusWrite 263
329% 240 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 31.4
2,810% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 41.9
DQ Mixed 34.9
2,713% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 247%
Great: 377%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
58GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 7.5
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 12.9
15% 12 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-MGJHB 06C1 SLA302G08-MGJHB 029E CML4GX3M1A1600C9 06C1 SLA302G08-MGJHB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 53.3
75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $530
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback