Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 04:12
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 694
72% 581 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 228
Parallax 247
136% 214 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 205
Splatting 139
156% 198 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 134%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 453 441 448 450 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 460
Mixed 362
SusWrite 450
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 51.9
170% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 351
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
694GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 111 111 112 108 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 114
Write 75.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 109
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 113%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
132GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 84 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 85.5
Write 79
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 83.6
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 74%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID c753
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.8 8.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 7.6
10% 9.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 36.7
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 21.7
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 60.1
66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback