Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 102
52% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 292
27% 228 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
EVGA(3842 1587) 1.5GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1012 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 32.8
24% 35.6 fps
MRender 44.7
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 33.3
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 160 50 163 156 157 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 271
Write 50.5
Mixed 107
SusWrite 133
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 20.2
92% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 52.7
65% 121 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
168GB free
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 93 91 92 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 80.3
Write 80.3
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 87.7
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
455GB free
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 72 72 71 71 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 88.6
Write 99.8
Mixed 54
SusWrite 70.5
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback