Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 2140-$45 1,317 User benchmarks, average bench 31% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Memory 47.1 1-Core 12.7 2-Core 14 20% 24.6 Pts	4-Core 16.6 8-Core 20.6 2% 18.6 Pts	64-Core 24.4 2% 24.4 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: VT100-50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 26 34 58 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 36.5 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 35.9 24% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.2 4.7 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	5.65% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 4 Mixed 8.3 SusWrite 4.8 10% 9.45 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.4 67% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.65% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.04% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3.6 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.04% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16