Asus M5A88-V EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A88-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111118
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateJun 01 '19 at 15:07
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 128
56% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 286
33% 255 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1556) 1GB
CLim: 951 MHz, MLim: 1089 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 9.81
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 12
Splatting 15.8
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 9%
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Asus(1043 843E) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 0.62
1% 1.29 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 283
Write 346
Mixed 268
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 32.6
108% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 41.7
36% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
200GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 256 250 242 240 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 363
Write 348
Mixed 310
SusWrite 248
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 38.5
124% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 49
40% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
592GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 140 140 140 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 162
Write 115
Mixed 38
SusWrite 137
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 114%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 151 160 159 158 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 126
Write 115
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 152
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 88%
G-DRIVE USB 8TB
27GB free, PID 8034
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 125 120 121 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 107
Write 116
Mixed 52
SusWrite 121
134% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
76% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 72%
G-DRIVE USB 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 8034
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 139 132 141 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 150
Write 158
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 139
169% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
79% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.9
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback