Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '19 at 02:18
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	BHR-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 77.5 1-Core 128 2-Core 256 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 715 75% 599 Pts	64-Core 1,344 83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Lighting 67.1 Reflection 69.1 Parallax 92 55% 76.1 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 65.1 Splatting 55.8 51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,551 Write 1,589 Mixed 1428 409% 1,856 MB/s	4K Read 66.4 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 88 294% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,094 DQ Write 781 DQ Mixed 914 689% 930 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 5GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.9 4.1 4 4.1 4.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	8.36% Terrible	Read 25.9 Write 12.8 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 3.9 15% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.4 131% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.36% Great: 17%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 14GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 20 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 31.8 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 18.9 37% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 13GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 11 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 22.3 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 11.5 27% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.8 164% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 40%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 5GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 6.5 6.4 6.9 6.8 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Read 10.6 Write 2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6.5 8% 6.28 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.3% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 24.9 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.5 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,405x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	540x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	227x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	245x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16