| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5K SE/EPU (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20081020 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 31 '19 at 20:46 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
43.1%
Average
|
35% 50.5 Pts
|
14% 107 Pts
|
6% 103 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.4%
Above average
|
50% 70.6 fps
|
50% 62.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 214 219 225 222 223 MB/s
|
55.7%
Above average
|
47% 210 MB/s
|
100% 31.6 MB/s
|
37% 51.4 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
602GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 62 61 61 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
45% 61.4 MB/s
|
113% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.6%
Very poor
|
14% 5.1 GB/s
|
14% 4.83 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K SE/EPU Builds (Compare 87 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K SE/EPU
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 16x |
| Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples | 8x |
| Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GTX 285NvidiaBench 9%, 2,842 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $180 |