| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Tsinghua H81M-CT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK H81M-CT |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20150213 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | May 31 '19 at 20:22 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.2%
Good
|
75% 125 Pts
|
36% 270 Pts
|
17% 276 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4170
|
3.18%
Terrible
|
3% 4.19 fps
|
4% 4.65 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 63 56 64 52 MB/s
|
43.2%
Average
|
22% 99.2 MB/s
|
99% 36.2 MB/s
|
54% 74.8 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
661GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 162 159 161 163 MB/s
|
75.2%
Very good
|
69% 94.7 MB/s
|
130% 1 MB/s
| |
|
Lacie P9233 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 41 39 40 MB/s
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
24% 32.2 MB/s
|
187% 1.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
29.3%
Poor
|
26% 9.2 GB/s
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
61% 65.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-CT Builds (Compare 36 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Tsinghua H81M-CT
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 11x |
| Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 7x |
| Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $226 |