Fujitsu FMVDG3R0E0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu FMVDG3R0E0  (all builds)
MotherboardWistron JIB65Y
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '19 at 16:09
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
U30, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 150
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 221
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 7.91
5% 7.16 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 65 65 69 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 49.5
Write 71.8
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 64.6
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Other 9905403-011.A02LF 99P5474-010.A00LF 99P5474-010.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback